Free Energy Here, Now and Then:Velocity Power Sources Introduction
Newark, New Jersey April, 1871.
Its was an overcast Monday, with a new sun attempting to break through the clouds ending the apathy of winter when I set out on my journey to visit the laboratory of a certain Henry Paine of Newark New Jersey. I had heard so much about Mr Paine's free energy machine that I wanted to see for myself what it is that this Mr Paine has created in his workshop. Could it actually be the free energy perpetual motion machine we have sought for so long? Might it not be merely another charlatan with a trick to show me? What might I find upon inspection of his shop? If he thinks he can fool me with a trick saw, I think we'll see about that. Will my visit to Mr Henry Paine be a journey in vain or a bountiful day?
~~~~~~~
In the original article this word is "power," an obvious misprint.] PAINE'S ELECTRO-MAGNETIC ENGINE [Scientific American, XXV, 21, 1871] To the Editor of the Scientific American: Having noticed several articles in your paper with reference to Paine's electro-magnetic machine, I believe I cannot do better than describe a visit which I paid it about three months ago.
Entering the office in company with a friend, at about twelve o'clock one day, I was told that the machine was not running then, but would be in operation at one.
Proceeding there alone, at about that time, I was, after the formality of sending up my name, conducted by a small boy, through numerous by-ways and passages, to the second story of a back building, where I was met by the illustrious inventor and a few select friends.
Mr. Paine began by showing the small model machines, which he set in motion by a battery of four cups, of about a gallon capacity each.
These models revolved very well, but apparently with no power, for they could be stopped easily.
I then began to reason with him on the absurdity of his position, and adduced in my support the experiments of Joule, Mayer, Faraday and others.
He, evidently, had no very high opinion of these, and pronounced the conservation of force an old fashioned idea, which had been overthrown in these enlightened days by his " experiments," though what the latter were I have never determined.
After conversing some time, to no purpose, he prepared to overthrow me and my authority at one blow, by an exhibition of The Machine.
This was standing in front of a chimney, on one side of the room, with the axis of its wheels parallel to
the wall.
The wheel to which the magnets were attached was, unlike the models, inclosed in a cast iron case, which enveloped it closely above, but spread out into a rectangular base below.
The latter rested directly on the floor. The axis of the wheel projected on each side, and, to one end, a pulley was attached, and to the other, the brake for operating the magnets.
The machine had the general appearance of a fan blower with an enlarged pulley.
The battery was attached to two binding screws, fixed to a standard on the chimney, and the current was supposed to pass from these, along wires, to the break piece, and thence to the magnets.
A belt on the pulley connected with a shaft overhead, whence another belt proceeded to the pulley of a small circular saw. As soon as the connection was made with the battery, the whole apparatus began to move, and soon the saw attained great velocity, shaking the building with violence. The latter effect was caused by a heavy fly wheel on the saw arbor, which probably was not well balanced.
When well in motion, boards were applied and sawed with the greatest ease. To show the excess of power, they were sometimes placed on edge and passed over the saw, so as wholly to envelop it, and the cut made from end to end, without the velocity being at all diminished.
On throwing off the belt from the saw, the machine still proceeded at the same velocity, with entire indifference to external resistance.
On mentioning this to Mr. Paine, he informed me that when the saw was attached, and the resistance greater, the increased pull on the magnets brought them nearer together, by bending the heavy iron frame; and, as magnetic attraction varies inversely as the square of the distance, it only required a small change of distance to account for the increased power.
I clearly indicated that I was skeptical on this point, and suggested that it would also work without variation if the power proceeded from some well governed steam engine in the neighborhood.
On this he intimated that, if I were not careful, a force might proceed from his body which would act in conjunction with gravitation in causing me to be projected through the window, and strike with violence on the ground below.
The exhibition being over, on going down stairs in company with the rest, I
tried the door of the room below, but found it locked, and the windows covered with papers.
I desired to get in, but was met with the assurance that the room was rented by a man who was then absent.
This, 1 believe, is the last visit paid by an outsider to this wonderful invention. I have been there several times since, but there has been no admittance to me, or to any one else.
I have since been to the owner of the building, and find that Mr. Paine rents the room to which I sought admittance, and also rents power in that same room, which is directly below that containing his machine.
The engine from which the power comes generally stops work at twelve and starts again at one, but sometimes works all day.
My visits there have established the following facts: First, That my friend and I were denied admittance at twelve o'clock, but were invited to come at one.
Second, That the shaft in the room below does not revolve between the hours of twelve and one. Third, That the room below, containing power, was rented by Mr. Paine, but that he kept it carefully locked, and misguided me as to the tenant.
Fourth, That the working parts are concealed in an unnecessarily strong case, well adapted to the concealment of another source of power.
Fifth, That part of the apparatus is attached to the wall, so that the machine must always occupy the same position on the floor.
Sixth, That the models have not a power proportionate to their size.
Seventh, That the machine runs at the same velocity, whether producing one horse power or a fraction of a horse power, and this without a governor.
These are the facts of the case. Where the power of the machine comes from I am unable to say. Is there some secret connection between this machine and the shaft below, and does the battery serve only to make this connection?
Or does the battery, when applied, connect the apparatus with a larger battery? I leave these questions to others; but, unless the reasoning and experiments of a host of our greatest men be false, and unless the greatest development of modern science be overthrown, this machine cannot but derive its power from some extraneous source.
In a late communication to your paper, Mr. Paine sets himself up as the peer of Faraday, Tyndall and others, and gives as the reason, his long devotion to science.
He evidently does not consider that to be ranked with such men requires something more than devotion; it requires brains; brains to discriminate between true science and quack-ish nonsense; brains to discover and originate.
And pray what fact, among the thousands of science, does Mr. Paine pretend to have proved beyond doubt ?
Let him answer. As to Mr. Paine's " science," I assert that it is a tissue of error and ignorance, from beginning to end.
Even his vaunted invention of metallic foil, wherewith to envelop his magnets or wire, can operate in no other manner than to the detriment of his machine, as any such metallic coating lengthens the demagnetization, which is the very thing to be guarded against.
This is due to an induced current, which forms in the coating, and, being in the same direction as the primary current, operates in the same manner to keep up the magnetism.
His reason for the machine's keeping at the same velocity also shows great ignorance of the subject. In the first place, the law of magnetic force, under these circumstances, is stated entirely wrong.
For this case, the true law is complex, but most nearly approaches to that of inversely as the distance, instead of as the square of the distance. (See Joule, and also Tyndall, in the London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine for 1850.)
And, in the second place, approach of the poles would not necessarily increase the efficiency; in this kind of machine there is a distance of maximum efficiency; and if the magnets revolve at a distance greater than this, the attraction becomes too small; and if at a less distance, the times of magnetizing and demagnetizing the magnets become too great, and the machine goes too slowly.
The distance in this machine is, undoubtedly, within the limit, for Mr. Paine prides himself upon its smallness, and so further reduction, could it take place, can act in no other manner than the opposite of that claimed.
But it is my opinion that all the force brought to bear on the magnets could not move them one two-hundredth of an inch, when attached to such a frame. As to Mr. Paine's disregard for the conservation of force, I have little to say.
His assertions are made directly in the face of this principle, and yet he has never adduced one experiment, or even a plausible reason, to prove what he says.
He takes you into a building where shafts are revolving by the vulgar power of steam, and directs you to look while he evokes power from nothing.
You must not touch anything; you must not enter the room below; you must not be there while the engine next door is at rest; but you must simply look, and by that renowned maxim of fools, that " seeing is believing/' you must believe that the whole structure of science has fallen, and that above its ruins nothing remains but Mr. Paine and his wonderful electro-magnetic machine. HENRY A. ROWLAND, C. E. Newark, N. J.
Rowland, Henry Augustus, 1848-1901. The physical papers of Henry Augustus Rowland ... [microform] (Kindle Locations 658-665). Baltimore : Johns Hopkins Press.
A group of us have been working on a preliminary railroad survey for the Western railway of New York from an office in Newark, New Jersey. This has brought about the opportunity to visit the laboratory of Mr Paine.
Its was an overcast Monday, with a new sun attempting to break through the clouds ending the apathy of winter when I set out on my journey to visit the laboratory of a certain Henry Paine of Newark New Jersey. I had heard so much about Mr Paine's free energy machine that I wanted to see for myself what it is that this Mr Paine has created in his workshop. Could it actually be the free energy perpetual motion machine we have sought for so long? Might it not be merely another charlatan with a trick to show me? What might I find upon inspection of his shop? If he thinks he can fool me with a trick saw, I think we'll see about that. Will my visit to Mr Henry Paine be a journey in vain or a bountiful day?
~~~~~~~
In the original article this word is "power," an obvious misprint.] PAINE'S ELECTRO-MAGNETIC ENGINE [Scientific American, XXV, 21, 1871] To the Editor of the Scientific American: Having noticed several articles in your paper with reference to Paine's electro-magnetic machine, I believe I cannot do better than describe a visit which I paid it about three months ago.
Entering the office in company with a friend, at about twelve o'clock one day, I was told that the machine was not running then, but would be in operation at one.
Proceeding there alone, at about that time, I was, after the formality of sending up my name, conducted by a small boy, through numerous by-ways and passages, to the second story of a back building, where I was met by the illustrious inventor and a few select friends.
Mr. Paine began by showing the small model machines, which he set in motion by a battery of four cups, of about a gallon capacity each.
These models revolved very well, but apparently with no power, for they could be stopped easily.
I then began to reason with him on the absurdity of his position, and adduced in my support the experiments of Joule, Mayer, Faraday and others.
He, evidently, had no very high opinion of these, and pronounced the conservation of force an old fashioned idea, which had been overthrown in these enlightened days by his " experiments," though what the latter were I have never determined.
After conversing some time, to no purpose, he prepared to overthrow me and my authority at one blow, by an exhibition of The Machine.
This was standing in front of a chimney, on one side of the room, with the axis of its wheels parallel to
the wall.
The wheel to which the magnets were attached was, unlike the models, inclosed in a cast iron case, which enveloped it closely above, but spread out into a rectangular base below.
The latter rested directly on the floor. The axis of the wheel projected on each side, and, to one end, a pulley was attached, and to the other, the brake for operating the magnets.
The machine had the general appearance of a fan blower with an enlarged pulley.
The battery was attached to two binding screws, fixed to a standard on the chimney, and the current was supposed to pass from these, along wires, to the break piece, and thence to the magnets.
A belt on the pulley connected with a shaft overhead, whence another belt proceeded to the pulley of a small circular saw. As soon as the connection was made with the battery, the whole apparatus began to move, and soon the saw attained great velocity, shaking the building with violence. The latter effect was caused by a heavy fly wheel on the saw arbor, which probably was not well balanced.
When well in motion, boards were applied and sawed with the greatest ease. To show the excess of power, they were sometimes placed on edge and passed over the saw, so as wholly to envelop it, and the cut made from end to end, without the velocity being at all diminished.
On throwing off the belt from the saw, the machine still proceeded at the same velocity, with entire indifference to external resistance.
On mentioning this to Mr. Paine, he informed me that when the saw was attached, and the resistance greater, the increased pull on the magnets brought them nearer together, by bending the heavy iron frame; and, as magnetic attraction varies inversely as the square of the distance, it only required a small change of distance to account for the increased power.
I clearly indicated that I was skeptical on this point, and suggested that it would also work without variation if the power proceeded from some well governed steam engine in the neighborhood.
On this he intimated that, if I were not careful, a force might proceed from his body which would act in conjunction with gravitation in causing me to be projected through the window, and strike with violence on the ground below.
The exhibition being over, on going down stairs in company with the rest, I
tried the door of the room below, but found it locked, and the windows covered with papers.
I desired to get in, but was met with the assurance that the room was rented by a man who was then absent.
This, 1 believe, is the last visit paid by an outsider to this wonderful invention. I have been there several times since, but there has been no admittance to me, or to any one else.
I have since been to the owner of the building, and find that Mr. Paine rents the room to which I sought admittance, and also rents power in that same room, which is directly below that containing his machine.
The engine from which the power comes generally stops work at twelve and starts again at one, but sometimes works all day.
My visits there have established the following facts: First, That my friend and I were denied admittance at twelve o'clock, but were invited to come at one.
Second, That the shaft in the room below does not revolve between the hours of twelve and one. Third, That the room below, containing power, was rented by Mr. Paine, but that he kept it carefully locked, and misguided me as to the tenant.
Fourth, That the working parts are concealed in an unnecessarily strong case, well adapted to the concealment of another source of power.
Fifth, That part of the apparatus is attached to the wall, so that the machine must always occupy the same position on the floor.
Sixth, That the models have not a power proportionate to their size.
Seventh, That the machine runs at the same velocity, whether producing one horse power or a fraction of a horse power, and this without a governor.
These are the facts of the case. Where the power of the machine comes from I am unable to say. Is there some secret connection between this machine and the shaft below, and does the battery serve only to make this connection?
Or does the battery, when applied, connect the apparatus with a larger battery? I leave these questions to others; but, unless the reasoning and experiments of a host of our greatest men be false, and unless the greatest development of modern science be overthrown, this machine cannot but derive its power from some extraneous source.
In a late communication to your paper, Mr. Paine sets himself up as the peer of Faraday, Tyndall and others, and gives as the reason, his long devotion to science.
He evidently does not consider that to be ranked with such men requires something more than devotion; it requires brains; brains to discriminate between true science and quack-ish nonsense; brains to discover and originate.
And pray what fact, among the thousands of science, does Mr. Paine pretend to have proved beyond doubt ?
Let him answer. As to Mr. Paine's " science," I assert that it is a tissue of error and ignorance, from beginning to end.
Even his vaunted invention of metallic foil, wherewith to envelop his magnets or wire, can operate in no other manner than to the detriment of his machine, as any such metallic coating lengthens the demagnetization, which is the very thing to be guarded against.
This is due to an induced current, which forms in the coating, and, being in the same direction as the primary current, operates in the same manner to keep up the magnetism.
His reason for the machine's keeping at the same velocity also shows great ignorance of the subject. In the first place, the law of magnetic force, under these circumstances, is stated entirely wrong.
For this case, the true law is complex, but most nearly approaches to that of inversely as the distance, instead of as the square of the distance. (See Joule, and also Tyndall, in the London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine for 1850.)
And, in the second place, approach of the poles would not necessarily increase the efficiency; in this kind of machine there is a distance of maximum efficiency; and if the magnets revolve at a distance greater than this, the attraction becomes too small; and if at a less distance, the times of magnetizing and demagnetizing the magnets become too great, and the machine goes too slowly.
The distance in this machine is, undoubtedly, within the limit, for Mr. Paine prides himself upon its smallness, and so further reduction, could it take place, can act in no other manner than the opposite of that claimed.
But it is my opinion that all the force brought to bear on the magnets could not move them one two-hundredth of an inch, when attached to such a frame. As to Mr. Paine's disregard for the conservation of force, I have little to say.
His assertions are made directly in the face of this principle, and yet he has never adduced one experiment, or even a plausible reason, to prove what he says.
He takes you into a building where shafts are revolving by the vulgar power of steam, and directs you to look while he evokes power from nothing.
You must not touch anything; you must not enter the room below; you must not be there while the engine next door is at rest; but you must simply look, and by that renowned maxim of fools, that " seeing is believing/' you must believe that the whole structure of science has fallen, and that above its ruins nothing remains but Mr. Paine and his wonderful electro-magnetic machine. HENRY A. ROWLAND, C. E. Newark, N. J.
Rowland, Henry Augustus, 1848-1901. The physical papers of Henry Augustus Rowland ... [microform] (Kindle Locations 658-665). Baltimore : Johns Hopkins Press.
A group of us have been working on a preliminary railroad survey for the Western railway of New York from an office in Newark, New Jersey. This has brought about the opportunity to visit the laboratory of Mr Paine.
This page WAS an introduction to the e book. Redone in 2016.
"Free energy: Here, Now and Then. Velocity Power Sources "
Power of the Cosmos to Brighten the Days of our Lives
Ancient Egyptian astronomers searched the skies for truth. When would the rains come and flood their fields? The skies held the answer. Just by knowing the position of the stars allowed them the right time to plant their fields.
Astronomy in Egypt began about 7,000 years ago. It was understood that earth was sitting still with all the stars and everything else in the universe spinning around it. One curiosity the ancient Egyptian astronomers noted was the small little circles that the stars cut in space as they rotated about during different times of the year. Unquestioned apparently, was the notion that planet earth was anything other than not in motion. Planet earth was sitting perfectly still was the opinion of the time. State power relied upon it. Planet earth was not in motion.
Thousands of years passed into the future when a new group of astronomers came on to the scene. The ancient Greeks worked on the question in about 300 BC; was planet earth in motion? Some said yes. General consensus remained no. Yet the question had been asked. Ptolemy in the second century AD posited that the earth was not in motion based on the fact that if it was, all the trees would be blowing in the wind. Does that conclusion not seem logical enough? It would be over a thousand years into the future until Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543) arrived on the scene with his book "On the Revolutions of the Celestial spheres" in 1543 AD. Using his startling mathematical proofs, Copernicus Established that our home world planet earth, is in motion. The authorities shortly found biblical force to forestall the acceptance of such a radical idea.
Shortly thereafter, Giordano Bruno (1548-1600) was put to death, burned at the stake in 1600 AD for his heresy that planet earth was in motion. The issue remained unsettled until 1727 when English astronomer Sir James Bradley (1693-1762) proved to the acceptance of the scientific community, that planet earth was in motion. Sir James proof that was accepted is called the "Aberration of light." Do we recall the little circles the stars made that the ancient Egyptians noted thousands of years before? What the ancient astronomers noted as the stars circled about in the night sky, is what Sir James denoted as the "Aberration of light."
By measuring a group of stars over a period of years Sir James noted that the stars changed position depending on what time of the year it was. Are we familiar with the Doppler effect? That is where a train coming at us blowing its whistle has a high pitched sound, and after the train passes, the whistle sounds much lower as the sound waves travel away from us. Though not exactly the same, can we consider that as our planet earth is moving towards a star, the star shows itself in one position, as Sir James noted, then at a different time of year our planet is moving in the opposite direction in its rotation around our sun, causing the position of the star that is under observation, to change its position, if ever so slightly. Sir James claimed that it was velocity that caused this aberration of light to appear.
After thousands of years it was finally settled; Sir James observations convinced even the sharpest skeptic, that planet earth, our home, is in hurtling in high velocity through the Cosmos in orbit around our sun.
By the time of Michael Faraday (1791-1867), the calculations were in. Planet earth's velocity was known. Professor Faraday knew that planet earth is in orbit around our sun at 18.5 miles per second (66,600 miles per hour). In his experiments in the 1830s Michael connected hundreds of feet of copper and steel wire, running them into a pond to see if he could extract energy from the high-speed motion of planet earth. Was Michael not on the right track? If we could hook a windmill up to the high velocity motion of planet earth, how much energy would that bring us? Would we not have unlimited energy from now until eternity if we could only harness earth motion energy? As to our windmill, is the technical issue that there is no wind in space to drive our windmill? How do we figure around that?
Lester Hendershot (1895-1960?) Had a dream of building a free energy motor. Lester claimed that he wound a magnet in the motor so that it would rotate in the opposite direction that the earth revolves. High speed velocity of planet earth was where Lester looked for free energy, just where Michael Faraday looked for it about a century before.
After thousands of years of speculation, we know for sure that planet earth is in high velocity motion. What then are the technical issues that will allow for us to draw energy from this high velocity motion?
That 's what "Free Energy; Here, Now and Then; Velocity Power Sources" was written for. To help give the answers. To speed bringing forward this life enhancing technology to all of us.
Nicola Tesla had a free energy light bulb running in 1899. He noted that as it was operating, the wiring to it was cold running. Ordinary electricity is hot. Why was this electricity cold? His discovery of cold electricity was awaiting a theoretical explanation for what it is.
Nathan Stubblefield (1860-1928) Had motors, lights, telephones and heaters running all using nothing but free energy. No understandable theoretical explanation, yet there it was, motors, lights and heaters running. His wiring of a telegraph using a buried battery in the ground. Should have lasted a few months. The telegraph ran for many years and eventually after new communications systems came in, the battery was dug up and found to be total corroded away. How did it provide power for all of those years? Free energy maybe? Once started free energy carries on. Nathan was found dead in his bed of starvation. His house toasty warm from the free energy machine he heated it with.
Almost too unbelievable but true, free energy velocity source machines have proven themselves for well over a century now. Yet if all this and more is true, why has this life enhancing technology been kept out of the hands of ordinary people?
Nicola Tesla made a proposal to J.P. Morgan in 1906 to build a stadium lighted with 5,000 light bulbs using free energy. J.P. Turned him down, took him off the payroll and pulled his laboratory to the ground. The decision made by the masters of finance were and still are, the human race is not to have its golden days.
What could be so bad about free energy that the finance crowd have stood against it for such an extended period of time now? What about the damage to our environment that we endure, would that not be corrected by implementing free-energy velocity machines? Why the big building of the war machine with its nuclear boom booms? Would free energy velocity power sources not allow us to select a different strategy than resource wars that we just don't need?
Professor Henry Rowland (1848-1901) examined in 1871 a free energy table saw in Newark New Jersey, of Henry Paine. Large cast iron legs with magnets shielded by foil. Professor Rowland wrote about it. Revealed that no matter what went into the saw, the speed never varied a bit. Drive Belt flew off under load, machine stayed the very same speed. Nothing like it before that Rowland had seen. All ordinary machines vary their speed due to load conditions, why did this free energy machine remain at the exact same speed? Professor Rowland asked Henry Paine about the theoretical operation of his table saw. Didn't fit with what was known about electrical theory. So though Mr Paine did not have a good theory of operation, his machine ran quite well anyways.
Dr. Henry Moray (1892-1974) Experimented with crystals in the early days of radio. His radios were so powerful that he could fry the speakers running it at high volume. These radios, had no external power connections, the energy was developed in Moray's circuitry and crystals. Henry went on to build the first fully transistorized free energy velocity power sources the mainstream world would see. Put bullet proof glass in his car. Survived being shot in his laboratory and repeated attempts on his life.
Edwin Gray (1925-1989) caused his free energy motors to operate by "splitting the positive" according to Mr Gray. He Died under somewhat mysterious circumstances in his laboratory at 64 years of age.
HHO, browns gas it is also known as. Powering large numbers of vehicles as a mileage enhancing water fuel gas at this moment. There is a Japanese water car that runs on nothing other than water and electricity. Seems too fantastic to be true doesn't it? Its real. It uses a HHO bottle to generate the gas and then uses the gas to power a fuel cell that charges a battery that drives an electric motor for the wheels. HHO has been in use for over a century. An electrical water gas that can power regular internal combustion engines. It is a proven over unity device.
Dr. Eugene Mallove (1947-2004) his research on shearing force oil heaters and their over unity effect. The 1989 discovery of cold fusion, that was rejected by establishment scientists. Dr. Mallove's open letter to the world. Universal Appeal for Support for New Energy Science and Technology, that he wrote announcing to the world that free energy was a real science that was needed by us all. Shortly thereafter he was stolen from us. Can we not sense the loss that we continue to suffer as this most needed technology of life is kept from us?
The four elements of free energy. Planetary high speed motion is the one we have focused on already. So what are the other three elements of free energy all about?
A technical issue concerns where energy is developed in any machine. That is, where is the torque point? If we think of a car engine, the main torque point is where we connect the engine to the frame of the car. The motor mounts it is connected to are where we develop torque from. In a windmill, where we connect it to the ground is where our main torque point is to be found. In attaching a machine to extract energy from the motion of our planet, there are a couple of significant technical issues that need to be addressed to properly understand the fundamentals of it.
The question is: Where is the torque point of planetary motion located at?
Another technical issue concerns the issue of friction, as is used in ordinary machines to extract energy such as a windmill. There are no friction points involved in planetary motion. So how do we turn our motors and heat our coils?
When Dr. Henry Moray demonstrated his transistorized free energy machine he was asked by a reporter where the energy was coming from, to which he replied "I don't know, but I think it has something to do with particle size."
Electricity that we use all the time is actually comprised of two distinct properties. Have you ever noticed a sticker on a TV or refrigerator or air conditioner how it will list the volts and the amperage? Volts are different in certain key ways than from amps. Amps are the magnetic side of electricity. Electricity is a slice of the electro-magnetic spectrum.
Faraday in his laboratory research in the 1830s determined that electricity had both volts and amps. He heated a wire with electricity in it, the amps remained and the volts disappeared. What Michael demonstrated was that the electrical field could be split by heating it. The early days of electronics used vacuum tubes that had heaters in them. These separated the light particles, volts, from the heavy particles, amps.
Did Dr. Moray intuitively grasp that his free energy machine was operating based on differences in particle size? Do we recall Edwin Gray and his motor that "split the positive?"
IN 1875 Alexander Graham Bell did an experiment using a telegraph system he worked on in Altoona, Pennsylvania, just outside of Pittsburgh. There was a thunder and lightening storm raging. He disconnected the batteries that powered the telegraph and was able to continue to use the telegraph. At first he considered that the lightening was pouring energy in some how. Some time after the storm, again he disconnected the batteries that powered the telegraph system. Again he found that he could use the system intermittently. It would run for a while and then run out of power. Let it sit by itself for a while, and somehow it extracted free energy from somewhere into the telegraph machine.
Have you ever baked bread? We've been using yeast for many thousands of years now. Have you heard that there has been no real explanation for where the energy is coming from that appears in the bread after the yeast have risen it? Would you believe that it is the motion of our planet that makes yeast rise up so well in bread? Mushroom same thing. Grow in the dark, so where is the energy source that powers them? Plants also can tap into electrical fields generated from planetary motion.
What about Newtons laws that say for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction? If this is so, how can there be any such thing as more energy coming out than energy going in?
The theoretical understanding of the next level of technology we can trace to the question that was posed by Aristotle in 4th century BC. He proposed that there is an Aether that pervades the universe. It is both near and in the outer world of space also. Albert Michelson and Edward Morley performed in 1887 what is now know as the Michelson Morley experiment. They went in search of the Aether that Aristotle has proposed existed everywhere in the 4th century BC. If we think of riding along in a car with the window open and we put our hand into the wind, we will feel the pressure of the wind on our skin. As it was well known at the time of Michelson-Morley that earth is in high velocity motion, this wind pressure of the high speed of earth motion should affect a beam of light as it passed through the Aether just as air passing by affects the air pressure on our hand. The experiment returned a null result. An Aether was not detected.
IN 1889 George Fitzgerald suggested the reason for no detection of an Aether was related to velocity. Something that is accelerated will compress. As earth is in accelerated motion, time and space are compressed to match the predicted variation that was expected. Herein was the beginning of relativistic sciences. The stepping off point for the second scientific revolution some have called the Michelson-Morley experiment. Is it a curious notion that things traveling at different speeds, also travel at different rates of time flow? This pertains to velocities that travel at percents of the speed of light.
If we have two clocks with their time set to match one another, and one clock is accelerated to 80% the speed of light, it will have a noticeable difference when we compare the times of the clocks again. If the clocks start out at 12 noon, and the clock that stays with us, after many hours reads 10 PM what will our accelerated clock read? 10 hours have passed in our inertial frame of reference. The other clock accelerated to 80% the speed of light will flow at 60% its original time flow rate. When we compare it with the 10 PM reading of our clock that stayed with us, our accelerated clock will read 6 PM.
Machines in use in our industries of today, energy is exchanged by ordinarily employing differentials in temperature, pressure or voltage as the motive force. Classical physics recognizes only kinetic (in motion) fields that can do work. In our advance into the second scientific revolution our machines will employ differentials in time. They will extract energy from static fields. Classical physic claims that no more energy can come out of a machine than goes in. In the next level of machinery for our civilization to employ, more energy will come out of our machines than goes in. Much more in fact. Consider that we are in high speed motion. Velocity is the source of this energy. Our solar system is in motion as is our galaxy. Energy can be extracted from anywhere in our universe because every thing is in motion. The Aether that Aristotle suggested exists and Michelson Morley tested for but did not find, does exist. Though it is yet to be more concisely explained as to what it is. By adding extra dimensions the puzzle of free energy is solved.
It is to theory of operation we wish to look to help us understand where the free energy is coming from. We are aware of high velocity motion of planet earth, yet the universe itself is in high speed motion all of the time also. Free energy is available in outer space as it is on earth.
Henry Andrew Bumstead (1870-1920) had been a student of Henry Rowland, and had studied the electromagnetic theory of light. His Yale graduate thesis was a "comparison of electrodynamic theories." He had attended a meeting of the American physical society in 1920 in Chicago. He was the chairman of the national research committee. On Christmas day he was returning by train to Washington DC. Absent from breakfast the next day, his associates went to his berth where they found Henry passed away.
Free energy here, now, and then. Could our top scientists have puzzled out the basic theoretical framework of free energy velocity power sources over a century ago? Henry Rowland.(1848-1901) passed at only 51. Now his student Henry Bumstead dead at 50? Eugene Mallove (1947-2004) stolen away in the prime of his technical prowess. Could there be a force lurking here and now stealing away our brightest? Was it stealing them away then?
The good news is, free energy velocity power sources are operating today. Using high performance electronics ultra-violet heat lamps are regularly producing nine times over energy input into them to dry a range of manufactured products. Why is this not big news on the mainstream screen? Why can we ask has this life sustaining technology been shoved off the front page and made to look as if it cannot be true? Why do we have so many nuclear power plants hurling waste upon us everyday? Why is the power of the Cosmos not with us as it should be?
It is with a fervent hope and prayer that the reader will grasp the enormity of goodness that will arrive when we have unlimited clean free energy by our side heating our homes and running our industries.
It is a real technology. Stopped in its tracks over a century ago. The world groans in pain as the missiles fly. War in 74 nations as our brothers and sisters die. Nuclear waste from leaking power plants is showered on us. We need all the help we can get to bring this technology of life in.
The cost has been high to bring it to life, when will it arrive?
"Free energy: Here, Now and Then. Velocity Power Sources "
Power of the Cosmos to Brighten the Days of our Lives
This book is Dedicated to the long list of workers who showed us the truth, and to those who strive for peace.
Available on Kindle or Amazon
If you have any comments, questions or something you would like to add, please send a message to me. Thank you.
To read a more thorough explanation of the theoretical basis of free energy Velocity Power sources read:
The Four Elements of Free Energy
Here:
http://bitchworld.weebly.com/the-four-elements-of-free-energy.html
"Free energy: Here, Now and Then. Velocity Power Sources "
Power of the Cosmos to Brighten the Days of our Lives
Ancient Egyptian astronomers searched the skies for truth. When would the rains come and flood their fields? The skies held the answer. Just by knowing the position of the stars allowed them the right time to plant their fields.
Astronomy in Egypt began about 7,000 years ago. It was understood that earth was sitting still with all the stars and everything else in the universe spinning around it. One curiosity the ancient Egyptian astronomers noted was the small little circles that the stars cut in space as they rotated about during different times of the year. Unquestioned apparently, was the notion that planet earth was anything other than not in motion. Planet earth was sitting perfectly still was the opinion of the time. State power relied upon it. Planet earth was not in motion.
Thousands of years passed into the future when a new group of astronomers came on to the scene. The ancient Greeks worked on the question in about 300 BC; was planet earth in motion? Some said yes. General consensus remained no. Yet the question had been asked. Ptolemy in the second century AD posited that the earth was not in motion based on the fact that if it was, all the trees would be blowing in the wind. Does that conclusion not seem logical enough? It would be over a thousand years into the future until Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543) arrived on the scene with his book "On the Revolutions of the Celestial spheres" in 1543 AD. Using his startling mathematical proofs, Copernicus Established that our home world planet earth, is in motion. The authorities shortly found biblical force to forestall the acceptance of such a radical idea.
Shortly thereafter, Giordano Bruno (1548-1600) was put to death, burned at the stake in 1600 AD for his heresy that planet earth was in motion. The issue remained unsettled until 1727 when English astronomer Sir James Bradley (1693-1762) proved to the acceptance of the scientific community, that planet earth was in motion. Sir James proof that was accepted is called the "Aberration of light." Do we recall the little circles the stars made that the ancient Egyptians noted thousands of years before? What the ancient astronomers noted as the stars circled about in the night sky, is what Sir James denoted as the "Aberration of light."
By measuring a group of stars over a period of years Sir James noted that the stars changed position depending on what time of the year it was. Are we familiar with the Doppler effect? That is where a train coming at us blowing its whistle has a high pitched sound, and after the train passes, the whistle sounds much lower as the sound waves travel away from us. Though not exactly the same, can we consider that as our planet earth is moving towards a star, the star shows itself in one position, as Sir James noted, then at a different time of year our planet is moving in the opposite direction in its rotation around our sun, causing the position of the star that is under observation, to change its position, if ever so slightly. Sir James claimed that it was velocity that caused this aberration of light to appear.
After thousands of years it was finally settled; Sir James observations convinced even the sharpest skeptic, that planet earth, our home, is in hurtling in high velocity through the Cosmos in orbit around our sun.
By the time of Michael Faraday (1791-1867), the calculations were in. Planet earth's velocity was known. Professor Faraday knew that planet earth is in orbit around our sun at 18.5 miles per second (66,600 miles per hour). In his experiments in the 1830s Michael connected hundreds of feet of copper and steel wire, running them into a pond to see if he could extract energy from the high-speed motion of planet earth. Was Michael not on the right track? If we could hook a windmill up to the high velocity motion of planet earth, how much energy would that bring us? Would we not have unlimited energy from now until eternity if we could only harness earth motion energy? As to our windmill, is the technical issue that there is no wind in space to drive our windmill? How do we figure around that?
Lester Hendershot (1895-1960?) Had a dream of building a free energy motor. Lester claimed that he wound a magnet in the motor so that it would rotate in the opposite direction that the earth revolves. High speed velocity of planet earth was where Lester looked for free energy, just where Michael Faraday looked for it about a century before.
After thousands of years of speculation, we know for sure that planet earth is in high velocity motion. What then are the technical issues that will allow for us to draw energy from this high velocity motion?
That 's what "Free Energy; Here, Now and Then; Velocity Power Sources" was written for. To help give the answers. To speed bringing forward this life enhancing technology to all of us.
Nicola Tesla had a free energy light bulb running in 1899. He noted that as it was operating, the wiring to it was cold running. Ordinary electricity is hot. Why was this electricity cold? His discovery of cold electricity was awaiting a theoretical explanation for what it is.
Nathan Stubblefield (1860-1928) Had motors, lights, telephones and heaters running all using nothing but free energy. No understandable theoretical explanation, yet there it was, motors, lights and heaters running. His wiring of a telegraph using a buried battery in the ground. Should have lasted a few months. The telegraph ran for many years and eventually after new communications systems came in, the battery was dug up and found to be total corroded away. How did it provide power for all of those years? Free energy maybe? Once started free energy carries on. Nathan was found dead in his bed of starvation. His house toasty warm from the free energy machine he heated it with.
Almost too unbelievable but true, free energy velocity source machines have proven themselves for well over a century now. Yet if all this and more is true, why has this life enhancing technology been kept out of the hands of ordinary people?
Nicola Tesla made a proposal to J.P. Morgan in 1906 to build a stadium lighted with 5,000 light bulbs using free energy. J.P. Turned him down, took him off the payroll and pulled his laboratory to the ground. The decision made by the masters of finance were and still are, the human race is not to have its golden days.
What could be so bad about free energy that the finance crowd have stood against it for such an extended period of time now? What about the damage to our environment that we endure, would that not be corrected by implementing free-energy velocity machines? Why the big building of the war machine with its nuclear boom booms? Would free energy velocity power sources not allow us to select a different strategy than resource wars that we just don't need?
Professor Henry Rowland (1848-1901) examined in 1871 a free energy table saw in Newark New Jersey, of Henry Paine. Large cast iron legs with magnets shielded by foil. Professor Rowland wrote about it. Revealed that no matter what went into the saw, the speed never varied a bit. Drive Belt flew off under load, machine stayed the very same speed. Nothing like it before that Rowland had seen. All ordinary machines vary their speed due to load conditions, why did this free energy machine remain at the exact same speed? Professor Rowland asked Henry Paine about the theoretical operation of his table saw. Didn't fit with what was known about electrical theory. So though Mr Paine did not have a good theory of operation, his machine ran quite well anyways.
Dr. Henry Moray (1892-1974) Experimented with crystals in the early days of radio. His radios were so powerful that he could fry the speakers running it at high volume. These radios, had no external power connections, the energy was developed in Moray's circuitry and crystals. Henry went on to build the first fully transistorized free energy velocity power sources the mainstream world would see. Put bullet proof glass in his car. Survived being shot in his laboratory and repeated attempts on his life.
Edwin Gray (1925-1989) caused his free energy motors to operate by "splitting the positive" according to Mr Gray. He Died under somewhat mysterious circumstances in his laboratory at 64 years of age.
HHO, browns gas it is also known as. Powering large numbers of vehicles as a mileage enhancing water fuel gas at this moment. There is a Japanese water car that runs on nothing other than water and electricity. Seems too fantastic to be true doesn't it? Its real. It uses a HHO bottle to generate the gas and then uses the gas to power a fuel cell that charges a battery that drives an electric motor for the wheels. HHO has been in use for over a century. An electrical water gas that can power regular internal combustion engines. It is a proven over unity device.
Dr. Eugene Mallove (1947-2004) his research on shearing force oil heaters and their over unity effect. The 1989 discovery of cold fusion, that was rejected by establishment scientists. Dr. Mallove's open letter to the world. Universal Appeal for Support for New Energy Science and Technology, that he wrote announcing to the world that free energy was a real science that was needed by us all. Shortly thereafter he was stolen from us. Can we not sense the loss that we continue to suffer as this most needed technology of life is kept from us?
The four elements of free energy. Planetary high speed motion is the one we have focused on already. So what are the other three elements of free energy all about?
A technical issue concerns where energy is developed in any machine. That is, where is the torque point? If we think of a car engine, the main torque point is where we connect the engine to the frame of the car. The motor mounts it is connected to are where we develop torque from. In a windmill, where we connect it to the ground is where our main torque point is to be found. In attaching a machine to extract energy from the motion of our planet, there are a couple of significant technical issues that need to be addressed to properly understand the fundamentals of it.
The question is: Where is the torque point of planetary motion located at?
Another technical issue concerns the issue of friction, as is used in ordinary machines to extract energy such as a windmill. There are no friction points involved in planetary motion. So how do we turn our motors and heat our coils?
When Dr. Henry Moray demonstrated his transistorized free energy machine he was asked by a reporter where the energy was coming from, to which he replied "I don't know, but I think it has something to do with particle size."
Electricity that we use all the time is actually comprised of two distinct properties. Have you ever noticed a sticker on a TV or refrigerator or air conditioner how it will list the volts and the amperage? Volts are different in certain key ways than from amps. Amps are the magnetic side of electricity. Electricity is a slice of the electro-magnetic spectrum.
Faraday in his laboratory research in the 1830s determined that electricity had both volts and amps. He heated a wire with electricity in it, the amps remained and the volts disappeared. What Michael demonstrated was that the electrical field could be split by heating it. The early days of electronics used vacuum tubes that had heaters in them. These separated the light particles, volts, from the heavy particles, amps.
Did Dr. Moray intuitively grasp that his free energy machine was operating based on differences in particle size? Do we recall Edwin Gray and his motor that "split the positive?"
IN 1875 Alexander Graham Bell did an experiment using a telegraph system he worked on in Altoona, Pennsylvania, just outside of Pittsburgh. There was a thunder and lightening storm raging. He disconnected the batteries that powered the telegraph and was able to continue to use the telegraph. At first he considered that the lightening was pouring energy in some how. Some time after the storm, again he disconnected the batteries that powered the telegraph system. Again he found that he could use the system intermittently. It would run for a while and then run out of power. Let it sit by itself for a while, and somehow it extracted free energy from somewhere into the telegraph machine.
Have you ever baked bread? We've been using yeast for many thousands of years now. Have you heard that there has been no real explanation for where the energy is coming from that appears in the bread after the yeast have risen it? Would you believe that it is the motion of our planet that makes yeast rise up so well in bread? Mushroom same thing. Grow in the dark, so where is the energy source that powers them? Plants also can tap into electrical fields generated from planetary motion.
What about Newtons laws that say for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction? If this is so, how can there be any such thing as more energy coming out than energy going in?
The theoretical understanding of the next level of technology we can trace to the question that was posed by Aristotle in 4th century BC. He proposed that there is an Aether that pervades the universe. It is both near and in the outer world of space also. Albert Michelson and Edward Morley performed in 1887 what is now know as the Michelson Morley experiment. They went in search of the Aether that Aristotle has proposed existed everywhere in the 4th century BC. If we think of riding along in a car with the window open and we put our hand into the wind, we will feel the pressure of the wind on our skin. As it was well known at the time of Michelson-Morley that earth is in high velocity motion, this wind pressure of the high speed of earth motion should affect a beam of light as it passed through the Aether just as air passing by affects the air pressure on our hand. The experiment returned a null result. An Aether was not detected.
IN 1889 George Fitzgerald suggested the reason for no detection of an Aether was related to velocity. Something that is accelerated will compress. As earth is in accelerated motion, time and space are compressed to match the predicted variation that was expected. Herein was the beginning of relativistic sciences. The stepping off point for the second scientific revolution some have called the Michelson-Morley experiment. Is it a curious notion that things traveling at different speeds, also travel at different rates of time flow? This pertains to velocities that travel at percents of the speed of light.
If we have two clocks with their time set to match one another, and one clock is accelerated to 80% the speed of light, it will have a noticeable difference when we compare the times of the clocks again. If the clocks start out at 12 noon, and the clock that stays with us, after many hours reads 10 PM what will our accelerated clock read? 10 hours have passed in our inertial frame of reference. The other clock accelerated to 80% the speed of light will flow at 60% its original time flow rate. When we compare it with the 10 PM reading of our clock that stayed with us, our accelerated clock will read 6 PM.
Machines in use in our industries of today, energy is exchanged by ordinarily employing differentials in temperature, pressure or voltage as the motive force. Classical physics recognizes only kinetic (in motion) fields that can do work. In our advance into the second scientific revolution our machines will employ differentials in time. They will extract energy from static fields. Classical physic claims that no more energy can come out of a machine than goes in. In the next level of machinery for our civilization to employ, more energy will come out of our machines than goes in. Much more in fact. Consider that we are in high speed motion. Velocity is the source of this energy. Our solar system is in motion as is our galaxy. Energy can be extracted from anywhere in our universe because every thing is in motion. The Aether that Aristotle suggested exists and Michelson Morley tested for but did not find, does exist. Though it is yet to be more concisely explained as to what it is. By adding extra dimensions the puzzle of free energy is solved.
It is to theory of operation we wish to look to help us understand where the free energy is coming from. We are aware of high velocity motion of planet earth, yet the universe itself is in high speed motion all of the time also. Free energy is available in outer space as it is on earth.
Henry Andrew Bumstead (1870-1920) had been a student of Henry Rowland, and had studied the electromagnetic theory of light. His Yale graduate thesis was a "comparison of electrodynamic theories." He had attended a meeting of the American physical society in 1920 in Chicago. He was the chairman of the national research committee. On Christmas day he was returning by train to Washington DC. Absent from breakfast the next day, his associates went to his berth where they found Henry passed away.
Free energy here, now, and then. Could our top scientists have puzzled out the basic theoretical framework of free energy velocity power sources over a century ago? Henry Rowland.(1848-1901) passed at only 51. Now his student Henry Bumstead dead at 50? Eugene Mallove (1947-2004) stolen away in the prime of his technical prowess. Could there be a force lurking here and now stealing away our brightest? Was it stealing them away then?
The good news is, free energy velocity power sources are operating today. Using high performance electronics ultra-violet heat lamps are regularly producing nine times over energy input into them to dry a range of manufactured products. Why is this not big news on the mainstream screen? Why can we ask has this life sustaining technology been shoved off the front page and made to look as if it cannot be true? Why do we have so many nuclear power plants hurling waste upon us everyday? Why is the power of the Cosmos not with us as it should be?
It is with a fervent hope and prayer that the reader will grasp the enormity of goodness that will arrive when we have unlimited clean free energy by our side heating our homes and running our industries.
It is a real technology. Stopped in its tracks over a century ago. The world groans in pain as the missiles fly. War in 74 nations as our brothers and sisters die. Nuclear waste from leaking power plants is showered on us. We need all the help we can get to bring this technology of life in.
The cost has been high to bring it to life, when will it arrive?
"Free energy: Here, Now and Then. Velocity Power Sources "
Power of the Cosmos to Brighten the Days of our Lives
This book is Dedicated to the long list of workers who showed us the truth, and to those who strive for peace.
Available on Kindle or Amazon
If you have any comments, questions or something you would like to add, please send a message to me. Thank you.
To read a more thorough explanation of the theoretical basis of free energy Velocity Power sources read:
The Four Elements of Free Energy
Here:
http://bitchworld.weebly.com/the-four-elements-of-free-energy.html
|
|