Red Star Rogue & UFO Connection
First section is some sample comments that were copied from amazon reader comments. That's to help aid in explaining what the story of Red Star Rogue is about from the extraterrestrial perspective. Bitch analysis is further in the text explaining the extraterrestrial aspect of what happened that caused a rocket motor to start up, catch on fire and explode, sending the the Russian submarine K-129 to the bottom of the sea. Was it a suicide machine? A death trap?
Red Star Rogue tells the story of the Russian K-129 submarine that attempted a nuclear missile attack upon Pearl Harbor Hawaii to begin a general nuclear war in 1968. Might we not view the event today as a triggering event designed to lead to a general nuclear war?
Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S.
Selected reader reviews from amazon.
5.0 out of 5 stars Not Much for Conspiracy Theories, But ...., September 18, 2005
By
Steve Iaco (northern new jersey) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
History records that in March 1968, President Johnson, succumbing to mounting pressures from the war in Vietnam, declined to stand for re-election. But Johnson may have had more than Vietnam on his mind. Earlier that fateful month, a nuclear-armed Soviet Golf-II submarine sank just 350 miles from Hawaii.
What the sub was doing there and how it met its demise may never be proven definitively. But author Kenneth Sewell presents a convincing case -- though one not without caveat, conjecture and speculation -- that the sub was a rogue executing a furtive mission to provoke a nuclear exchange between the U.S. and China. As Sewell presents it, the KGB commandeered the sub, K-129, with the intention of delivering a nuclear strike on Pearl Harbor. The audacious plan -- masterminded by KGB Boss Yuri Andropov and his mentor, Mikhail Suslov -- would be executed in a way that pointed responsibility at China, capitalizing on growing U.S. fears of a bellicose Mao Zedong. A U.S.-developed fail-safe mechanism, designed to prevent an unauthorized missile launch, is all the prevented the sinister plan from succeeding. The Johnson Administration had shared the fail-safe technology with Moscow only a couple of years before the incident. Instead of incinerating Pearl and a good part of Oahu, the nuclear missile destroyed the K-129, sending all 98 crewmen to their final resting place at the bottom of the Pacific.
Sewell relates at length the K-129 incident's diplomatic impact -- he speculates that it facilitated both Nixon's detente with the Soviets and his rapprochement with the Chinese -- as well as elaborate CIA efforts to recover the enemy sub (in violation of international law) and to keep the truth about the renegade sub's motives from ever being revealed.
I don't go in much for conspiracy theories. And a casual reader has no way of knowing how much of Sewell's tale is truth and how much is fiction. But the case he makes certainly sounds plausible - or at least possible.
Red Star Rogue tells the story of the Russian K-129 submarine that attempted a nuclear missile attack upon Pearl Harbor Hawaii to begin a general nuclear war in 1968. Might we not view the event today as a triggering event designed to lead to a general nuclear war?
Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S.
Selected reader reviews from amazon.
5.0 out of 5 stars Not Much for Conspiracy Theories, But ...., September 18, 2005
By
Steve Iaco (northern new jersey) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
History records that in March 1968, President Johnson, succumbing to mounting pressures from the war in Vietnam, declined to stand for re-election. But Johnson may have had more than Vietnam on his mind. Earlier that fateful month, a nuclear-armed Soviet Golf-II submarine sank just 350 miles from Hawaii.
What the sub was doing there and how it met its demise may never be proven definitively. But author Kenneth Sewell presents a convincing case -- though one not without caveat, conjecture and speculation -- that the sub was a rogue executing a furtive mission to provoke a nuclear exchange between the U.S. and China. As Sewell presents it, the KGB commandeered the sub, K-129, with the intention of delivering a nuclear strike on Pearl Harbor. The audacious plan -- masterminded by KGB Boss Yuri Andropov and his mentor, Mikhail Suslov -- would be executed in a way that pointed responsibility at China, capitalizing on growing U.S. fears of a bellicose Mao Zedong. A U.S.-developed fail-safe mechanism, designed to prevent an unauthorized missile launch, is all the prevented the sinister plan from succeeding. The Johnson Administration had shared the fail-safe technology with Moscow only a couple of years before the incident. Instead of incinerating Pearl and a good part of Oahu, the nuclear missile destroyed the K-129, sending all 98 crewmen to their final resting place at the bottom of the Pacific.
Sewell relates at length the K-129 incident's diplomatic impact -- he speculates that it facilitated both Nixon's detente with the Soviets and his rapprochement with the Chinese -- as well as elaborate CIA efforts to recover the enemy sub (in violation of international law) and to keep the truth about the renegade sub's motives from ever being revealed.
I don't go in much for conspiracy theories. And a casual reader has no way of knowing how much of Sewell's tale is truth and how much is fiction. But the case he makes certainly sounds plausible - or at least possible.
This book is way over due., September 21, 2005
By bam418 "bam418" (NY) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
I've never believed the story about the CIA's Project Jennifer being a failure. If the claw broke and the sub was lost, the Glomar Explorer would have returned home..maximum time out of a week to ten days. So why didn't they come home? Why did it stay out on station for 41 days--enough time to make six or seven trips to the bottom? It's because the submarine wasn't in one piece as we were told. It, like most submarines that sink in deep water, broke into multiple pieces when it hit the bottom. Want proof? Look at the pictures of the USS Scorpion.
Another thing that never made sense is: why would the CIA spend $500 million dollars to retrieve an outdated, diesel submarine? That's $500 million in 1968 dollars. (I seem to remember that you could buy pickup for about $2,500 back then.) That Gold sub was an old piece of crap when it sank. The newer nuclear powered Yankee subs were alaredy replacing these WWII style subs. Retrieving that sub six years after it sank, would only have yielded a water logged piece of trash that was still out of date and six years older. By the time the Glomar sailed, there were several newer Soviet submarines on the bottom--subs with newer technology, newer crypto gear, newer codes and nuclear power plants.
Finally---some real answers! A book you will not want to put down.
Howard Hughes’ Hughes Glomar Explorer, the ship that was used to retrieve the sunken Soviet nuclear-armed submarine as part of Project Azorian in 1974.
By bam418 "bam418" (NY) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
I've never believed the story about the CIA's Project Jennifer being a failure. If the claw broke and the sub was lost, the Glomar Explorer would have returned home..maximum time out of a week to ten days. So why didn't they come home? Why did it stay out on station for 41 days--enough time to make six or seven trips to the bottom? It's because the submarine wasn't in one piece as we were told. It, like most submarines that sink in deep water, broke into multiple pieces when it hit the bottom. Want proof? Look at the pictures of the USS Scorpion.
Another thing that never made sense is: why would the CIA spend $500 million dollars to retrieve an outdated, diesel submarine? That's $500 million in 1968 dollars. (I seem to remember that you could buy pickup for about $2,500 back then.) That Gold sub was an old piece of crap when it sank. The newer nuclear powered Yankee subs were alaredy replacing these WWII style subs. Retrieving that sub six years after it sank, would only have yielded a water logged piece of trash that was still out of date and six years older. By the time the Glomar sailed, there were several newer Soviet submarines on the bottom--subs with newer technology, newer crypto gear, newer codes and nuclear power plants.
Finally---some real answers! A book you will not want to put down.
Howard Hughes’ Hughes Glomar Explorer, the ship that was used to retrieve the sunken Soviet nuclear-armed submarine as part of Project Azorian in 1974.
1.0 out of 5 stars Conspiracy candy, January 6, 2008
By D. Burke "Happy The Golden Prince" (Opelika, AL United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
I looked at this book as an academic. I study nuclear weapons development, delivery systems, and all that stuff. If it blows up real big, I am into it. So please do take this into consideration as I go into my review.
This book is about as plausible as the last Sasquatch sighting. But perhaps that is why so many people seem to desperately want to cling to it. The author makes several unforgivable lapses in judgement, such as reconstructing the last days of the K-129 - a Golf II class ballistic missile sub that he asserts was on its way with 11 "mysterious" personnel who somehow were trying to launch an SLBM at Pearl Harbor in 1968, in the hopes that the U.S. would automatically suspect the CHINESE and attack them, thus eliminating Russia's main continental threat. He furthermore maintains that the warhead suffered a low-order detonation of the warhead as a result of the Permissive Action Lock failsafe device triggering some of its plastic explosives as a means of somehow punishing a crew severely if it tried something sneaky.
PUH-LEEZE!!!!!
First, the author needs to content himself with some facts: he claims to have worked as in the reactor space of one of our snooper-boats, yet he obviously doesn't recall ever having "Spooks," or CIA intelligence-gathering operatives on his boat. If he does, then why doesn't he think that the Soviets did the same thing? Or they could have been technicians working on the newly-installed navigational gear. But of course, these were just mystery men who seized the boat. I'm getting spooked already...
Then there is his reconstruction of the events of the sub just prior to its loss. HE CANNOT KNOW THIS STUFF - THE ONLY ONES WHO DID DIED ON THE BOAT. But it is a "Non-fiction novel," right? La la la la la... Now the psychopathic commies raise to fire their missile and...
This gets goofy: he describes a "cold launch" system to fire the missiles FROM A SURFACED POSITION - in essence this system uses compressed air to blow the missile free from its launch tube AS THE SUBMARINE IS SUBMERGED. The predecessor to the submarine, the Golf I class HAD to fire while surfaced, and used an elevator platform to lift the missile clear of the launch tube, of which there were three located in the sail. The Golf II was specifically created to be able to utilize the R-21 missile, which GAVE IT AN UNDERWATER LAUNCH CAPABILITY. If the author had even bothered to actually read Pavel podvig's book, "Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces," WHICH HE CITES, he would know that the K-129 would not have fired from the surface, but submerged. But well, that would conflict with the story... La la la la la....
So the permissive action lock triggered the missile's warhead to self destruct? IT DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY. It prevents the missile from firing, or the warhead from detonating, but it DOESN'T POP THE EXPLOSIVES ON THE WARHEAD. It would render it inert - and THAT IS ASSUMING THAT THE R-21 HAD A PAL SYSTEM. Not to mention that such an explosion would have opened up the missile's fuel tanks (it was a liquid-fuelled missile after all) and most likely would have blown open the missile hatches covering the other two birds in their tubes. GUESS WHAT HAPPENS THEN? You have two more missiles blowing their fuel tanks, and in the end, there wouldn't be enough of that sub left to fit in a sardine can. Boom. Big rocket fuel explosion. Bye bye boat, and Mr. Hughes doesn't build the Glomar Explorer.
I hope that I haven't ruined anyone's fun here, and if you like sea stories, this one might keep you company on a rainy night, but it is absolutely implausible. Oh, I didn't mention that he states that a secret "Jennifer" satellite "detected" the missile fuel explosion. I thought that "Jennifer" was the code name for the attempted recovery, not surveillance of the world for infrared sources... And being able to discern "between house fires and rocket fuel." Errr, right. I am familiar with the Vela satellites, and I am familiar with the early warning satellites that sit in geosynchronous orbits at great distance that look for rocket plumes, but this satellite system is unfamiliar to me... OH, THAT'S RIGHT - he cites THAT information FROM A DISCOVERY CHANNEL TV PROGRAM. Now if that isn't an accurate source, I don't know what is. When the television becomes part of the basis of a book that claims to be somewhat factual, I blanch. If that is the case, the author may wish to ask Starfleet if Scotty would be so kind as to beam him up to the Enterprise so he can look at the dilithium crystals.
He discounts the possibility that there was a missile fuel leak, or another scenario where the sub might have surfaced briefly to try and vent its missile tube - such as in the scenario portrayed in the book "Hostile Waters" where a leaking launch tube caused a missile detonation and the eventual loss of the sub and several of its crew. But that would dismiss the idea that psycho Reds were trying to get us to blow up the Chinese...
AND THE CHINESE DID NOT HAVE A BALLISTIC MISSILE SUB OF THEIR OWN UNTIL 1988. How would they have nuked us at Pearl Harbor?
Oh, and there's lots of Glomar Explorer conspiracy hooplah, but I have probably taken up enough of your time.
This book requires a willing suspense of disbelief. As I study this stuff for a living, I ain't that willing.
Though K-129's loss had long been thought an accident, the authors boldly argue otherwise - the K-129 disaster resulted from a botched attempt to hijack the sub and attack Hawaii, a plan sanctioned at the top of the Soviet leadership in the hopes of instigating a Chinese-American war. The authors also repudiate accounts of the Glomar Explorer's only partial success in recovering K-129.
Doesn't hold water, September 20, 2005
By SubGuru - See all my reviews
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
A good yarn, but the author's story about a rogue Soviet sub is full of far-fetched suppositions, conspiracy-theory, incorrect facts and unsubstantiated claims. If you approach this book as a techno-thriller, it's at least as good as the latest submarine fiction from DiMercurio, for example. But, starting at about page 72, don't trust anything the author says as fact....
The story of K-129 is described briefly in "The Silent War", by John P. Craven. Craven devotes just two pages on the 'rogue submarine' theory. Unlike the authors of Red Star Rogue, Craven doesn't claim definitively that K-129 was a 'rogue' sub. What he says is, "There existed a possibility, small though it might be, that the skipper of this rogue submarine was attempting to launch...a ballistic missile with a live warhead in the direction of Hawaii....There is also a small probability that this launch attempt doomed the sub."
Unlike Craven, Sewell and Richmond assert that K-129 DID try to launch a missile at Hawaii, and that a 'failsafe' boobytrap DID destroy the sub. The subtitle of their book, "The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S." says it all.
As a former submariner, I think it's much more likely that K-129 was lost after an explosion in one of the missile tubes during a routine patrol, much like what happened to the Yankee-class sub K-219 in October 1986 off of Bermuda. (Unless, of course, you believe the 'Hostile Waters' conspiracy theory that K-219 sank after colliding with an American sub -- If you believe that, then you must also believe that a U.S. sub torpedoed the Russian submarine Kursk.)
What Sewell and Richmond has done is to take a hypothetical theory and spin it into a yarn of 'fact', using unsubstantiated claims and suppositions to try and hold their story together.
Go ahead and read this book, but don't believe everything you read.
By SubGuru - See all my reviews
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
A good yarn, but the author's story about a rogue Soviet sub is full of far-fetched suppositions, conspiracy-theory, incorrect facts and unsubstantiated claims. If you approach this book as a techno-thriller, it's at least as good as the latest submarine fiction from DiMercurio, for example. But, starting at about page 72, don't trust anything the author says as fact....
The story of K-129 is described briefly in "The Silent War", by John P. Craven. Craven devotes just two pages on the 'rogue submarine' theory. Unlike the authors of Red Star Rogue, Craven doesn't claim definitively that K-129 was a 'rogue' sub. What he says is, "There existed a possibility, small though it might be, that the skipper of this rogue submarine was attempting to launch...a ballistic missile with a live warhead in the direction of Hawaii....There is also a small probability that this launch attempt doomed the sub."
Unlike Craven, Sewell and Richmond assert that K-129 DID try to launch a missile at Hawaii, and that a 'failsafe' boobytrap DID destroy the sub. The subtitle of their book, "The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S." says it all.
As a former submariner, I think it's much more likely that K-129 was lost after an explosion in one of the missile tubes during a routine patrol, much like what happened to the Yankee-class sub K-219 in October 1986 off of Bermuda. (Unless, of course, you believe the 'Hostile Waters' conspiracy theory that K-219 sank after colliding with an American sub -- If you believe that, then you must also believe that a U.S. sub torpedoed the Russian submarine Kursk.)
What Sewell and Richmond has done is to take a hypothetical theory and spin it into a yarn of 'fact', using unsubstantiated claims and suppositions to try and hold their story together.
Go ahead and read this book, but don't believe everything you read.
This one is a page turner!, December 29, 2012
By James Thompson (Ottawa, ON, Canada) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Kindle Edition)
A great "Conspiracy Theory" kind of book . . . so much so that I am surprised Jesse Ventura hasn't jumped on the story. Sewell covers everything here, espionage, murder, conspiracy, world politics. It reads like a true doomsday thriller, blending facts and conjecture so well, the reader is left wondering if the scenario Sewell suggests is indeed the case.
The details on the building of Glomar Explorer and Project Azorian jive with all I have read previously, while adding some tantalizing new bits too.
To sum up, I'd say Ken Sewell makes your skin creep with a great "what if" story. You'll like it.
By James Thompson (Ottawa, ON, Canada) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Kindle Edition)
A great "Conspiracy Theory" kind of book . . . so much so that I am surprised Jesse Ventura hasn't jumped on the story. Sewell covers everything here, espionage, murder, conspiracy, world politics. It reads like a true doomsday thriller, blending facts and conjecture so well, the reader is left wondering if the scenario Sewell suggests is indeed the case.
The details on the building of Glomar Explorer and Project Azorian jive with all I have read previously, while adding some tantalizing new bits too.
To sum up, I'd say Ken Sewell makes your skin creep with a great "what if" story. You'll like it.
Turning Point in History!, December 23, 2005
By Loyd E. Eskildson "Pragmatist" (Phoenix, AZ.) - See all my reviews
(HALL OF FAME REVIEWER) (REAL NAME)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
Sewell cannot be commended enough for documenting the story of K-129, an extremely important story of a near Cold War disaster. The story involves an older model diesel-electric Soviet submarine 350 miles off the coast of Hawaii carrying three nuclear missiles and in the midst of a 3/7/68 countdown for a surface launch against Honolulu. Subsequent intelligence indicated that the submarine had been taken over by an 11-man KGB crew added at the last minute. K-129 was capable of an undersea launch and hitting Hawaii from about 1,200 miles away - however, doing so from the surface at a much closer distance matched the newest Chinese submarine capability. Since the profiles of the K-129 and Chinese submarines were very similar the KGB leadership intended that the U.S. conclude that the attack came from China, launch a massive retaliation against China (becoming increasingly hostile to the U.S.S.R.), and allow Russia to then move into and exploit desirable areas of China.
The "good news" is that the KGB either didn't know about the warheads' "fail-safe" mechanism (which may have been modeled after U.S. technology donated to the Soviets), or failed to bypass it. In any case, conventional explosives detonated the warhead as it was being launched - destroying and sinking the submarine while dispersing radioactive material in the area.
A KGB assumption was that the U.S. was not able to track Soviet submarines. However, the submerged listening cables near the Russian base for K-129, special receiving sensors, and numerous satellites were able to do so. As a result, the U.S. knew almost exactly where K-129 was at the time of its sinking, while the Soviets assumed it was at the last location it reported from - almost 1,000 miles away.
The "bad news" is that Soviets concluded that the American submarine Swordfish (photographed returning damaged to Japan) had punctured K-129 from below, causing its demise. As a result, the Americans suspect that Soviets torpedoed and sank the U.S. submarine Scorpion a few weeks later in the Atlantic.
Fortunately the U.S. Halibut (deep research submarine) was able to locate K-129 (the Soviets could not), take countless photos and retrieve its bell. Nixon/Kissenger arranged for some of the photos to be anonymously left at the Russian Embassay; the information and photos also helped improve relations with Communist China. Top-level U.S. thinking is that the photos helped Brezhnev overpower Suslov and Andropov - the plot's leaders who lived in the same apartment buildilng in Moscow. (The plotters were known to be very upset at the direction the U.S.S.R. was moving in.) Two years later the plotters were all missing from the May Day parade - illnesses; shortly thereafter the U.S. and Russia signed Salt I and other agreements.
The final act in this saga was the U.S. (via Hughes Tool and Glomar Explorer supposedly mining manganese nuggets) recovering most of the K-129. At least two Russian bodies were buried at sea, with honors; not much else is known about the specifics of what else was recovered.
Excellent, well-worth reading!
By Loyd E. Eskildson "Pragmatist" (Phoenix, AZ.) - See all my reviews
(HALL OF FAME REVIEWER) (REAL NAME)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
Sewell cannot be commended enough for documenting the story of K-129, an extremely important story of a near Cold War disaster. The story involves an older model diesel-electric Soviet submarine 350 miles off the coast of Hawaii carrying three nuclear missiles and in the midst of a 3/7/68 countdown for a surface launch against Honolulu. Subsequent intelligence indicated that the submarine had been taken over by an 11-man KGB crew added at the last minute. K-129 was capable of an undersea launch and hitting Hawaii from about 1,200 miles away - however, doing so from the surface at a much closer distance matched the newest Chinese submarine capability. Since the profiles of the K-129 and Chinese submarines were very similar the KGB leadership intended that the U.S. conclude that the attack came from China, launch a massive retaliation against China (becoming increasingly hostile to the U.S.S.R.), and allow Russia to then move into and exploit desirable areas of China.
The "good news" is that the KGB either didn't know about the warheads' "fail-safe" mechanism (which may have been modeled after U.S. technology donated to the Soviets), or failed to bypass it. In any case, conventional explosives detonated the warhead as it was being launched - destroying and sinking the submarine while dispersing radioactive material in the area.
A KGB assumption was that the U.S. was not able to track Soviet submarines. However, the submerged listening cables near the Russian base for K-129, special receiving sensors, and numerous satellites were able to do so. As a result, the U.S. knew almost exactly where K-129 was at the time of its sinking, while the Soviets assumed it was at the last location it reported from - almost 1,000 miles away.
The "bad news" is that Soviets concluded that the American submarine Swordfish (photographed returning damaged to Japan) had punctured K-129 from below, causing its demise. As a result, the Americans suspect that Soviets torpedoed and sank the U.S. submarine Scorpion a few weeks later in the Atlantic.
Fortunately the U.S. Halibut (deep research submarine) was able to locate K-129 (the Soviets could not), take countless photos and retrieve its bell. Nixon/Kissenger arranged for some of the photos to be anonymously left at the Russian Embassay; the information and photos also helped improve relations with Communist China. Top-level U.S. thinking is that the photos helped Brezhnev overpower Suslov and Andropov - the plot's leaders who lived in the same apartment buildilng in Moscow. (The plotters were known to be very upset at the direction the U.S.S.R. was moving in.) Two years later the plotters were all missing from the May Day parade - illnesses; shortly thereafter the U.S. and Russia signed Salt I and other agreements.
The final act in this saga was the U.S. (via Hughes Tool and Glomar Explorer supposedly mining manganese nuggets) recovering most of the K-129. At least two Russian bodies were buried at sea, with honors; not much else is known about the specifics of what else was recovered.
Excellent, well-worth reading!
Close call, May 1, 2006
By Anthony Tome (Boulder, CO) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
I just completed reading Red Star Rogue. It was compelling beause I was in Hawaii on that date - March 7, 1968. While there certainly is strong evidence to support the authors hypothesis, in the form of photographic evidence, satellite surveillance, hydrophonic signatures, the analysis of the oil slick by the University of Hawaii, and the subs departure from normal operating procedure, there were two questions that I felt were not adequately addressed. The foremost being the issue of the fail safe device. In his book Sewell states that missiles were delivered to K-129 before departure on their ill fated mission. The KBG had control of all nuclear warheads in the USSR. The KBG was part of the plot. Why didn't the KBG remove the fail safe device on these missiles so that no code, held by multiple parties, was needed to launch them?
Second, of lesser importance, how did the Soviets finally determine there were 98 men on board the sub? No crew manifest was ever found according to Russian sources. Is this information that was obtained from an internal Soviet investigation after information on the K-129's mission was shared with Bresznev? The author does not explain either of these two important points.
By Anthony Tome (Boulder, CO) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
I just completed reading Red Star Rogue. It was compelling beause I was in Hawaii on that date - March 7, 1968. While there certainly is strong evidence to support the authors hypothesis, in the form of photographic evidence, satellite surveillance, hydrophonic signatures, the analysis of the oil slick by the University of Hawaii, and the subs departure from normal operating procedure, there were two questions that I felt were not adequately addressed. The foremost being the issue of the fail safe device. In his book Sewell states that missiles were delivered to K-129 before departure on their ill fated mission. The KBG had control of all nuclear warheads in the USSR. The KBG was part of the plot. Why didn't the KBG remove the fail safe device on these missiles so that no code, held by multiple parties, was needed to launch them?
Second, of lesser importance, how did the Soviets finally determine there were 98 men on board the sub? No crew manifest was ever found according to Russian sources. Is this information that was obtained from an internal Soviet investigation after information on the K-129's mission was shared with Bresznev? The author does not explain either of these two important points.
Horses and Ostriches, April 23, 2006
By Richard F. Grantges "truth maven" (MN North Woods) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
It has been said that you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. Also the propensity of ostriches to put their heads firmly in the sand when threatened is well known (true or not). The reviews of this startling book remind me of both of these cliches. I too have found that people just DON'T WANT TO HEAR about this incident which seems amply proved to me. Not only is the case itself well made, but the probable fall out from the disaster explains so many puzzling events of the cold war that I at least am persuaded. Like most Americans I had many other "important" things going on in my life during the period covered. The disinformation campaigns were extremely convincing if anyone had been curious. I feel that every American ought to try to read this book. It is tough going. That's why I only give it 4 stars. It is repetitious and awfully dull reading at times. In other places it is riveting. The book has the feeling of truth. When was the last time you read a book about contemporary affairs that had that feeling? I especially recommend the last few chapters to the unbelievers.
By Richard F. Grantges "truth maven" (MN North Woods) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
It has been said that you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. Also the propensity of ostriches to put their heads firmly in the sand when threatened is well known (true or not). The reviews of this startling book remind me of both of these cliches. I too have found that people just DON'T WANT TO HEAR about this incident which seems amply proved to me. Not only is the case itself well made, but the probable fall out from the disaster explains so many puzzling events of the cold war that I at least am persuaded. Like most Americans I had many other "important" things going on in my life during the period covered. The disinformation campaigns were extremely convincing if anyone had been curious. I feel that every American ought to try to read this book. It is tough going. That's why I only give it 4 stars. It is repetitious and awfully dull reading at times. In other places it is riveting. The book has the feeling of truth. When was the last time you read a book about contemporary affairs that had that feeling? I especially recommend the last few chapters to the unbelievers.
This book has credibility from a very different source,April 25, 2007
By
Guy with a mission - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
I found this book to be credible from a very different line of evidence. I was stunned to read about this event because after almost 40 years of wondering it suddenly made sense of a life-defining event in my life. I can't bracket the time more closely than some time in early 1968 (I remember the first buds on the trees), but I wonder if what happened to me then relates to this Red Star Rogue story that I learned about only a year ago.
In 1968 was a very young pastor in Lincoln, Nebraska, just out of seminary. I was praying late one night in our church office when I felt a tremendous terror: it was like I could "see" a Satanic figure entering the front doors of our church, walking down the main aisle of the sanctuary getting ready to turn left toward our offices. I have never, ever experienced such utter horror and fear. I was praying frantically, confessing any sin, but suddenly found myself desperately screaming in prayer for the safety of our country. In this experience, I had the strong impression (and had told others later) that someone in Russia was about to pull the nuclear trigger--I couldn't tell if they had or hadn't. After a long terrifying time I felt it was over and that we were OK.
I naturally had doubts about my discerning such an event, because it all sounded so implausible. But at the same time I couldn't account for my prayer experience that was so unspeakably real, powerful and occurring only once like that in my life. That week I told friends about this prayer experience. Five of them (three in different US states) told me that they had also felt it necessary to pray for the safety of the country that week, something that was unusual for them, so I felt that I wasn't the only one that sensed the danger. I have had a few other similar experiences like this (like for personal protection or healing), that proved to be valid, but never, ever anything so intense and terrifying.
I would have one disagreement with the authors: they suggest that it was the fail-safe device that kicked in on launch, but I find two problems with that: 1) surely the "unknown" crew, commissioned from the highest levels to launch the missle, would have had the launch codes right, but more importantly, 2) any "fail-safe" mechanism would allow the missle to launch and detonate well clear of the sub and the crew, and not blow up at ignition, as in this case, destroying both. There was evidence that the fail-safe explosives went off, but that could have been a consequence of the on-launch explosion of the dangerous liquid fuel, like the Squall torpedo that destroyed the Kursk sub recently.
Frankly, I believe the hand of God intervened, limiting the consequences to the tragic loss of the crew, as a powerful message to Suslov and Andropov (the ultimate perpetrators, "soul-less men with dead eyes" as one Soviet Navy man described them). Sadly, the wife of the sub captain had a similar "spiritual" experience of horrifying grief, as she collapsed sobbing and was hospitalized at the time sub went down with her husband, not knowing directly what had happened until much later.
I always wondered what in the world was going on during that time, almost 40 years ago, but never had any possible answer until recently, when I read a summary of Red Star Rogue in an online financial newsletter and later in the book itself. From my own life-changing experience, then, I'd say the book has credibility, and adds credibility to the testimony that events of history are also *divinely* shaped--representing more than the naive plans of men and the mere collision of molecules.
Jon R., PhD
By
Guy with a mission - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
I found this book to be credible from a very different line of evidence. I was stunned to read about this event because after almost 40 years of wondering it suddenly made sense of a life-defining event in my life. I can't bracket the time more closely than some time in early 1968 (I remember the first buds on the trees), but I wonder if what happened to me then relates to this Red Star Rogue story that I learned about only a year ago.
In 1968 was a very young pastor in Lincoln, Nebraska, just out of seminary. I was praying late one night in our church office when I felt a tremendous terror: it was like I could "see" a Satanic figure entering the front doors of our church, walking down the main aisle of the sanctuary getting ready to turn left toward our offices. I have never, ever experienced such utter horror and fear. I was praying frantically, confessing any sin, but suddenly found myself desperately screaming in prayer for the safety of our country. In this experience, I had the strong impression (and had told others later) that someone in Russia was about to pull the nuclear trigger--I couldn't tell if they had or hadn't. After a long terrifying time I felt it was over and that we were OK.
I naturally had doubts about my discerning such an event, because it all sounded so implausible. But at the same time I couldn't account for my prayer experience that was so unspeakably real, powerful and occurring only once like that in my life. That week I told friends about this prayer experience. Five of them (three in different US states) told me that they had also felt it necessary to pray for the safety of the country that week, something that was unusual for them, so I felt that I wasn't the only one that sensed the danger. I have had a few other similar experiences like this (like for personal protection or healing), that proved to be valid, but never, ever anything so intense and terrifying.
I would have one disagreement with the authors: they suggest that it was the fail-safe device that kicked in on launch, but I find two problems with that: 1) surely the "unknown" crew, commissioned from the highest levels to launch the missle, would have had the launch codes right, but more importantly, 2) any "fail-safe" mechanism would allow the missle to launch and detonate well clear of the sub and the crew, and not blow up at ignition, as in this case, destroying both. There was evidence that the fail-safe explosives went off, but that could have been a consequence of the on-launch explosion of the dangerous liquid fuel, like the Squall torpedo that destroyed the Kursk sub recently.
Frankly, I believe the hand of God intervened, limiting the consequences to the tragic loss of the crew, as a powerful message to Suslov and Andropov (the ultimate perpetrators, "soul-less men with dead eyes" as one Soviet Navy man described them). Sadly, the wife of the sub captain had a similar "spiritual" experience of horrifying grief, as she collapsed sobbing and was hospitalized at the time sub went down with her husband, not knowing directly what had happened until much later.
I always wondered what in the world was going on during that time, almost 40 years ago, but never had any possible answer until recently, when I read a summary of Red Star Rogue in an online financial newsletter and later in the book itself. From my own life-changing experience, then, I'd say the book has credibility, and adds credibility to the testimony that events of history are also *divinely* shaped--representing more than the naive plans of men and the mere collision of molecules.
Jon R., PhD
Good, but I'm not quite buying it, June 10, 2007
By
Loren Pechtel - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
There have been a lot of quibbles about details in the various reviews, most of them are missing the fundamental point: If it wasn't an attempted rogue launch, what was it?
On the other hand, I don't buy the notion that the missile was destroyed by a fail-safe. There's one problem with that notion: Why was somebody outside at launch? I can't imagine that that would be survivable. I think it's much more likely something went wrong preparing to launch.
Addressing various gripes:
I don't think disagreements about exactly where it sunk matter because the CIA has an incentive to hide it's true location.
As for the guy who said there would be nothing to salvage if the nuke went off--it's only the high explosive that seems to have gone off. If you simply fire one of the detonators the warhead will be blown to bits but will *NOT* produce a nuclear yield. All the detonators must be fired at *EXACTLY* the right instant for it to make a mushroom cloud.
As for China not having such missiles--they did. The Gulf I the Russians sold them. They didn't have h-bombs to put on them but we had no conclusive evidence they didn't have them, either.
By
Loren Pechtel - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
There have been a lot of quibbles about details in the various reviews, most of them are missing the fundamental point: If it wasn't an attempted rogue launch, what was it?
On the other hand, I don't buy the notion that the missile was destroyed by a fail-safe. There's one problem with that notion: Why was somebody outside at launch? I can't imagine that that would be survivable. I think it's much more likely something went wrong preparing to launch.
Addressing various gripes:
I don't think disagreements about exactly where it sunk matter because the CIA has an incentive to hide it's true location.
As for the guy who said there would be nothing to salvage if the nuke went off--it's only the high explosive that seems to have gone off. If you simply fire one of the detonators the warhead will be blown to bits but will *NOT* produce a nuclear yield. All the detonators must be fired at *EXACTLY* the right instant for it to make a mushroom cloud.
As for China not having such missiles--they did. The Gulf I the Russians sold them. They didn't have h-bombs to put on them but we had no conclusive evidence they didn't have them, either.
what about the bell, November 16, 2005
By N. weinberger "Submarine Buff" - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
i read the book, and also the review of mr. feldman. without going into much detail, i would like to ask mr. feldman how he explains the fact that the american delegation in Moscow, handed them over the submarines bell?!. which clearly showed that they recovered more then just the front portion.
also, what is the secrecy, if this is just another cold war story, why is the government up in arms to protect the information, when bigger secrets have been declassified.
in my humble opinion, these 2 facts are the ones which irrefutably support mr. sewel's theory.
By N. weinberger "Submarine Buff" - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)
This review is from: Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S. (Hardcover)
i read the book, and also the review of mr. feldman. without going into much detail, i would like to ask mr. feldman how he explains the fact that the american delegation in Moscow, handed them over the submarines bell?!. which clearly showed that they recovered more then just the front portion.
also, what is the secrecy, if this is just another cold war story, why is the government up in arms to protect the information, when bigger secrets have been declassified.
in my humble opinion, these 2 facts are the ones which irrefutably support mr. sewel's theory.
Bitch review:
While certain details of the sinking of Russia' ballistic missile submarine K-129 are open to opinion and may remain that way until the government records of the event are made public, one thing for certain, Ken Sewell has done a public service by bringing this event to light and informing us of this menace and unnecessary hazard. Might his book not have revealed the real plot and plan for the use of nuclear weapons against us? Are there some folks who are not yet aware that the plan from the very beginning of the nuclear age was to exterminate the mass of the human race with nuclear weaponry?
Human Beings are comprised of many terrain varieties with a range of differing cultural cipher values. The overwhelming vast majority of the human race accept Father's cipher rules: "Thou shalt not kill."
There is one group that do not agree with this. Weap Judah has made himself a deity on earth and decided that he has the right to slay his fellow man. He has chosen of his own free will to kill his fellow man, though there is no need to do it. He kills for sport. Might we also not be mature enough now to understand that God and the angels in heaven are extraterrestrials that gave us our high thinking life?
Privatized Control of bourse has allowed Judah to hire industry to build a war machine that can extinguish all life on the surface of planet earth. For what reason can we ask did he do this? Might we not ask more pertinently, why do we allow him to continue to hold on to the authority to issue our money knowing full well what he has done with it?
The control of bourse by the weap Judah cipher has brought upon humanity a continuous series of wars since the issue of American money was privatized by the Federal Reserve bank in 1913. Using the power inherent in the control of the issue of bourse, the cipher of weap Judah has taken over the planet using war as its preferred tool to do it. The Russians who directed the attempt to begin a nuclear war using the Russian submarine K-129, might we not now see them as Judah shell hybrid people? That is, they breed into the Russian people, and yet use that as a cover to install their Jewish ciphers into the population.
Do we not understand that Weap Judah has a genocide cipher? Do we not accept as true that His cipher made the decision to extinct the mass of the human race?
Is it within reason to consider that Judah's self-given destiny was and is to destroy us all? Is there any other conclusion we could reach based on the facts of the nuclear menace he boursed up and put on us? How about the many times he has launched nuclear missiles on us?
Are we not aware of the assignment his elders gave to him called for exterminating the mass of the human race and burning up the surface of planet earth?
Should we not consider Karl Liebknecht's (1871-1919) view on External wars as tools to subordinate the mass of the population to exploitation at the hands of the dominant class? Do we not recognize that the authority he took hold of, to issue the bourse, is where Judah power comes from? Do we not see that the authority to issue our money is nothing less than the ORGANIZING PRINCIPLE of society? Elder clued this chair as to that.
Can we not appreciate that war itself is merely a contrived situation and not part of God's children's desires to do, or any part of Father's plans for us to do either?
Do some of us now understand that war is a sport of weap Judah? Do we appreciate that the issue of money is the organizing principle of society? This authority to issue bourse (money) in his private hands, has made available to the weap Judah crowd unlimited free money, that he has used to stage events and provoke wars in continuous fashion upon God's children since 1913. 1913 is when Judah corruptly took this power of the purse into his hands.
Using America as his platform, he has built a war machine able on its own to extinct all mankind. Can we only wonder how many times he has tried to do this? K-129? USS Liberty? Cuban missile crisis? Disaster at Silo 7? Do we not see a pattern here of creating and provoking confrontations?
If K-129 had succeeded in launching its nuclear tipped missiles, would that attack upon Pearl Harbor not likely trigger a general all out nuclear war? Could there have been another plan than that?
Did we note the report in Ken Sewell's book of the experience of the minister in Omaha, "I could "see" a Satanic figure entering the front doors of our church, I had the strong impression (and had told others later) that someone in Russia was about to pull the nuclear trigger-...
Can we not appreciate that God our Father has sent the angels in to protect us from nuclear destruction? Do we see a confirmation of our protection by the visitation to the minister? Did the angels not reveal to him what was going on concerning the plans for a nuclear attack?
Are we not mature enough to accept the fact that the plan from before the beginning of the nuclear age was to extinct the mass of the human race?
(Victoria's secret, "Extinguish them humble" March 11, 1881)
Can we make a connection with the extraterrestrial intervention into our world as a way to prevent our nuclear extermination at the hands of weap Judah?
How many can we only wonder have contemplated the "Magnitude of the deception" that has allowed Judah to build 150,000 nuclear weapons using the power of our bourse?
With a planet in deep trouble and war in numerous countries all financed by American bourse, Could it be anything other than the hand of God that has kept us in?
Our elders from space do not traffic in pain or cruelty and never take life. Though they have the technical power to, they would never shoot or sink a submarine. If that is so, then can we conjecture how it was that K-129 blew up and went to the bottom of the sea?
Before a missile is launched, a test is done on the circuits. While it will show that the circuit is in operation and connected electrically, when the trigger is pulled, the circuit values are variably modified and changed due to factors such as inductive reactance or magnetic reluctance in the circiut. These values are temperature sensitive, and can produce variations in circuit operations.
Our elders from space have technologies that are thousands of years beyond ours. Could they have inserted temperature modification control "Bubbles" on specific components of the control circuitry of the Ballistic missile, allowing the circuit values to change when under inductive load? Did kind elders put a temperature software block on K-129's missiles preventing them from being launched on us?
Do we not find the plot to attack us with nuclear weapons in the confirmation of the minister who had Satan walk into his church, and sense that visit to the minister as a way that our elders choose to speak to us? Can we not thank God our Father for sparing our lives in a world full of nuclear weapons?
Is it not likely that Our elders from space have been in contact with the heads of all the major states of the world? Is it not likely that they would have informed the leaders that K-129 was a "Suicide machine?"
When the trigger was pulled, instead of launching the missile out of the launch tube as it was designed to, did the 'temperature' reconfigured circuitry instead start the rocket motor while still in the launch tube causing a fire and subsequent explosion?
Simultaneously, of the 14 implosion explosives surrounding the plutonium package inside the warhead, did temperature bubbles direct 1 explosive to fire, blowing up the plutonium package, decommissioning and spreading radioactive elements to the sea to neutralize the warhead first and to then spread the nuclear material so that it would be discovered later?
Could the intervention by our high level elders be the reason why there remains secrecy concerning this long ago event of the cold war era?
Thank you Ken Sewell for bringing this rogue submarine attempt to start a nuclear war to the attention of the world. Andropov. Suslov. Weap Judahs?
Can we not work together and take control of the bourse so that we can remove these weapons of genocide and stop the war?
Oh, and the book "Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S.
Read it. See what you think.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/did-mystery-russian-sub-k129-set-out-to-start-world-war-iii/news-story/a4440749968525767f8ce8176691ad3b
While certain details of the sinking of Russia' ballistic missile submarine K-129 are open to opinion and may remain that way until the government records of the event are made public, one thing for certain, Ken Sewell has done a public service by bringing this event to light and informing us of this menace and unnecessary hazard. Might his book not have revealed the real plot and plan for the use of nuclear weapons against us? Are there some folks who are not yet aware that the plan from the very beginning of the nuclear age was to exterminate the mass of the human race with nuclear weaponry?
Human Beings are comprised of many terrain varieties with a range of differing cultural cipher values. The overwhelming vast majority of the human race accept Father's cipher rules: "Thou shalt not kill."
There is one group that do not agree with this. Weap Judah has made himself a deity on earth and decided that he has the right to slay his fellow man. He has chosen of his own free will to kill his fellow man, though there is no need to do it. He kills for sport. Might we also not be mature enough now to understand that God and the angels in heaven are extraterrestrials that gave us our high thinking life?
Privatized Control of bourse has allowed Judah to hire industry to build a war machine that can extinguish all life on the surface of planet earth. For what reason can we ask did he do this? Might we not ask more pertinently, why do we allow him to continue to hold on to the authority to issue our money knowing full well what he has done with it?
The control of bourse by the weap Judah cipher has brought upon humanity a continuous series of wars since the issue of American money was privatized by the Federal Reserve bank in 1913. Using the power inherent in the control of the issue of bourse, the cipher of weap Judah has taken over the planet using war as its preferred tool to do it. The Russians who directed the attempt to begin a nuclear war using the Russian submarine K-129, might we not now see them as Judah shell hybrid people? That is, they breed into the Russian people, and yet use that as a cover to install their Jewish ciphers into the population.
Do we not understand that Weap Judah has a genocide cipher? Do we not accept as true that His cipher made the decision to extinct the mass of the human race?
Is it within reason to consider that Judah's self-given destiny was and is to destroy us all? Is there any other conclusion we could reach based on the facts of the nuclear menace he boursed up and put on us? How about the many times he has launched nuclear missiles on us?
Are we not aware of the assignment his elders gave to him called for exterminating the mass of the human race and burning up the surface of planet earth?
Should we not consider Karl Liebknecht's (1871-1919) view on External wars as tools to subordinate the mass of the population to exploitation at the hands of the dominant class? Do we not recognize that the authority he took hold of, to issue the bourse, is where Judah power comes from? Do we not see that the authority to issue our money is nothing less than the ORGANIZING PRINCIPLE of society? Elder clued this chair as to that.
Can we not appreciate that war itself is merely a contrived situation and not part of God's children's desires to do, or any part of Father's plans for us to do either?
Do some of us now understand that war is a sport of weap Judah? Do we appreciate that the issue of money is the organizing principle of society? This authority to issue bourse (money) in his private hands, has made available to the weap Judah crowd unlimited free money, that he has used to stage events and provoke wars in continuous fashion upon God's children since 1913. 1913 is when Judah corruptly took this power of the purse into his hands.
Using America as his platform, he has built a war machine able on its own to extinct all mankind. Can we only wonder how many times he has tried to do this? K-129? USS Liberty? Cuban missile crisis? Disaster at Silo 7? Do we not see a pattern here of creating and provoking confrontations?
If K-129 had succeeded in launching its nuclear tipped missiles, would that attack upon Pearl Harbor not likely trigger a general all out nuclear war? Could there have been another plan than that?
Did we note the report in Ken Sewell's book of the experience of the minister in Omaha, "I could "see" a Satanic figure entering the front doors of our church, I had the strong impression (and had told others later) that someone in Russia was about to pull the nuclear trigger-...
Can we not appreciate that God our Father has sent the angels in to protect us from nuclear destruction? Do we see a confirmation of our protection by the visitation to the minister? Did the angels not reveal to him what was going on concerning the plans for a nuclear attack?
Are we not mature enough to accept the fact that the plan from before the beginning of the nuclear age was to extinct the mass of the human race?
(Victoria's secret, "Extinguish them humble" March 11, 1881)
Can we make a connection with the extraterrestrial intervention into our world as a way to prevent our nuclear extermination at the hands of weap Judah?
How many can we only wonder have contemplated the "Magnitude of the deception" that has allowed Judah to build 150,000 nuclear weapons using the power of our bourse?
With a planet in deep trouble and war in numerous countries all financed by American bourse, Could it be anything other than the hand of God that has kept us in?
Our elders from space do not traffic in pain or cruelty and never take life. Though they have the technical power to, they would never shoot or sink a submarine. If that is so, then can we conjecture how it was that K-129 blew up and went to the bottom of the sea?
Before a missile is launched, a test is done on the circuits. While it will show that the circuit is in operation and connected electrically, when the trigger is pulled, the circuit values are variably modified and changed due to factors such as inductive reactance or magnetic reluctance in the circiut. These values are temperature sensitive, and can produce variations in circuit operations.
Our elders from space have technologies that are thousands of years beyond ours. Could they have inserted temperature modification control "Bubbles" on specific components of the control circuitry of the Ballistic missile, allowing the circuit values to change when under inductive load? Did kind elders put a temperature software block on K-129's missiles preventing them from being launched on us?
Do we not find the plot to attack us with nuclear weapons in the confirmation of the minister who had Satan walk into his church, and sense that visit to the minister as a way that our elders choose to speak to us? Can we not thank God our Father for sparing our lives in a world full of nuclear weapons?
Is it not likely that Our elders from space have been in contact with the heads of all the major states of the world? Is it not likely that they would have informed the leaders that K-129 was a "Suicide machine?"
When the trigger was pulled, instead of launching the missile out of the launch tube as it was designed to, did the 'temperature' reconfigured circuitry instead start the rocket motor while still in the launch tube causing a fire and subsequent explosion?
Simultaneously, of the 14 implosion explosives surrounding the plutonium package inside the warhead, did temperature bubbles direct 1 explosive to fire, blowing up the plutonium package, decommissioning and spreading radioactive elements to the sea to neutralize the warhead first and to then spread the nuclear material so that it would be discovered later?
Could the intervention by our high level elders be the reason why there remains secrecy concerning this long ago event of the cold war era?
Thank you Ken Sewell for bringing this rogue submarine attempt to start a nuclear war to the attention of the world. Andropov. Suslov. Weap Judahs?
Can we not work together and take control of the bourse so that we can remove these weapons of genocide and stop the war?
Oh, and the book "Red Star Rogue: The Untold Story of a Soviet Submarine's Nuclear Strike Attempt on the U.S.
Read it. See what you think.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/did-mystery-russian-sub-k129-set-out-to-start-world-war-iii/news-story/a4440749968525767f8ce8176691ad3b
Have you heard about the September 18, 1980 DISASTER AT SILO 7? That was when a Titan missile with a multi megaton warhead blew up in its launch tube in Damascus, Arkansas. Here's a link to read about it, or click on the button.
http://bitchworld.weebly.com/disaster-at-silo-7.html
http://bitchworld.weebly.com/disaster-at-silo-7.html